Narrow Boots (98mm and smaller)


Atomic Nuke 130

Testers loved the Nuke 130 for its close wrap on the lower leg, its comfortable tongue design and its initial indoor flex feel. Many noted that the dual cam buckle power strap helped with the fit along the shin and all liked the buckles and closure system.

Virtually all testers commented that the lower boot offered more room than they expected to find in the 98 mm category but many noted a tight fit at the navicular bone and styloid process. Our larger guys and more aggressive skiing testers found the fore/aft support a bit lacking and mentioned wanting to stiffen the boot's flex. Lighter weight testers and those who preferred more flex range had no such complaint.

Tester Comments

  • Doug McCaffrey: "Very comfortable for a 98 mm – the bedroom slipper of the category"
  • Joey Roberts: "Great, solid stance for aggressive skiing."
  • Nick Blaylock: "Nice cuff provides grip on leg for leverage."

Tester Comments

  • Mike Porter: "Dynamic balance good laterally but not fore/aft — a little weak."
  • Neal Scholey: "I’d have to increase my level of beer consumption so my narrow feet were bloated enough to fill out the boot."
  • Jim Schaffner: "Something feels a little disjointed between the connection of upper and lower."

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.7 See how we calculate

Dalbello Krypton Pro

The Kryptonr’s flex tongue design and low ankle hinge point give it a unique flex feel. Buckle tension directly affects both the stiffness and stance. Buckle it tighter, you're straighter and stiffer. Run it looser, flexion is more buoyant. Some testers loved skiing the boot from the cuff and found it well-suited for variable conditions, off-piste cruising and bump whittling. Others felt its lateral power was below category standard.

Testers all agreed that the Krypton’s out-of-box lateral stance was slightly in, making it perfect for knock-kneed skiers. Neutral and bowlegged skiers will need an upper cuff adjustment. Speaking of adjustments, the buckles and adjustments are also unorthodox and require a bit of study to understand. But they and the bag of fit widgets that comes in the box, gives your ABB boot tech a lot of options for customizing the boot for fit and function. Skiers with bony feet and high insteps will also need their bootfitter to tweak the Krypton's very snug midfoot width and Cabrio-style instep design.

Tester Comments

  • Doug McCaffrey: "Interesting flex pattern for an alpine boot. . .surprisingly great feel for the snow, sensitive."
  • Mark Elling: "Edge power is there but a bit hard to get at due to undercanted (knock-kneed) set-up – makes for greasy crud and powder cruisin'."
  • Nick Blaylock: "Very responsive for rotary movements and steering – great in bumps and the woods."

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.0 See how we calculate

Fisher X-One Twenty

The X-One Twenty is a lean and low carving machine. It has a lower-than-average cuff height with an aggressive forward lean angle and a classic Soma-Tec abducted stance. The flex is soft for the category but the fit is decidedly low-volume.

Fischer’s Soma-Tec stance geometry continues to intrigue, please and confound testers depending on their stance alignment needs and biases. First and foremost, testers with noticeably abducted (duck-footed) stances take to the Fischer boots like ducks to water. Sorry. But testers with a history of finding themselves over-edged in most boots (i.e. hard to release the inside edge) seem to find a balanced stance here as well. Those testers with steeply ramped bindings found themselves dealing with a little quad burn. The X-One Twenty’s out-of-box set-up will favor flatter ramped bindings which provide better fore-aft balance.

For those with a memory of vintage boots, the X-One Twenty’s initial fit is reminiscent of late-model San Marcos. It’s short in length and very snug everywhere, especially from the top of the foot through the instep and up along the shin. Vacuum-bag-like fit tension here makes this a great choice for skiers with low volume feet.

Tester Comments

  • Doug McCaffrey: "Very quick with the Soma-Tec stance, too quick in fact, I had to pay attention!"
  • Greg Hoffmanns: "Really great fit with aggressive heel hold."
  • Jim Schaffner: "I love the feel of this boot while skiing, though this fit crushes my foot. It's one of the most powerful boots for me in fast, long-radius turns."

Tester Comments

  • Mike Porter: "soft for a 120 flex – hard to say balanced in crud and bumps."
  • Todd Metz: "The ski wanted to run away at the top of the turn."

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.0 See how we calculate

Full Tilt Classic

Admittedly, the Full Tilt is a not targeted to the bulk of our testers who are 30+ years old and not regular park and pipe visitors. Perhaps they just didn't get the new-school-from-old-made-new-again thing. But on the flip side, these guys are old enough to have spent plenty of days in the time-tested (and then tested again) Raichle Flexon series boots that Full Tilt is the reincarnation of. Perhaps they’re afraid to delve too deeply into the resin-caked memories of the 80’s they’ve by now successfully repressed.

Their thumbnail report is as follows: The Classic works best side-to-side in lateral movements and has a certain spring-in-your-step feel. It’s lightweight. It fits a little shorter than newer styles, is snug in the forefoot and midfoot and offers the most room in the cankle zone. The Classic’s stance is a little bit more forward than average and laterally the boots stand a little inboard (knock-kneed). Buckles are cable-strand design and you either think they're sick, or just sick, depending on your age, buckle preferences and parlance. The spiral-wrap Intuition liner creates a very custom fit within the shell confines but offers a much different flex feel from the back-in-the-day Flexon tongue liner.

Tester Comments

  • Mark Elling: "The boot works best side-to-side in lateral movements and has a certain spring-in-your-step feel. It's lightweight."
  • Jim Schaffner: "For leaning and tipping into natural arcs it's okay and after heat molding the liner the comfort level was reasonable."
  • Neal Scholey: "Nostalgia stories."

Tester Comments

  • Mark Elling: "You can find balance, but you're not placed there – if you find the G-Spot you can lay into it, but there’s lots of probing around."
  • Neal Scholey: "I found it hard to initiate turns."
  • Jim Schaffner: "I found it difficult to engage the edges."

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.2 See how we calculate

Garmont Shaman 130

Testers unanimously praised the Shaman 130 for its anatomically sculpted shell shape and accurate out-of-the-box fit. They commended both its power and precision on snow. The Shaman masquerades as some sort of "backside," or AT-style boot, but testers were not fooled. Yes, the boot comes with a modular set of Vibram soles intended to make it more versatile for hike-to descents and rock scrambling. But testers felt it was every bit as powerful as a regular alpine race boot and dominated variable conditions at high speed with the very best in the category.

Some testers found the Shaman 130 to be lighter than others in the category, again pointing toward its potential for some limited touring. But this boot is all about going down, fast, not up. Some testers noted an overly damp feel for the snow and occasional lack of pop, which may have stemmed from testers using their custom insoles on top of an aggressively humped arch in the bootboard. Skiers who use footbeds will want to make sure their ABB bootfitter planes this arch hump out of the bootboard, allowing the foot to sit neutrally on their footbeds.

While testers across the board felt the Shaman 130 was at the top of the performance class, a few also lamented the boot’s limited presence in specialty alpine shops. You may have to do a little hunting to find one for try-on.

Tester Comments

  • Doug McCaffrey: "Felt very neutral, upright, but not in the backseat and had very precise edging, at all speeds."
  • Mike Porter: "Extremely comfortable for 98mm category – fun, accurate, playful and quick."
  • Brian Blackstock: "Strong precise edging power while still being able to skid and slip – put the AT soles on these and you have the ultimate coaches’ boot."
  • Chris Wiberg: "Slammin’ – skis like a race boot!"

Tester Comments

  • Nick Blaylock: "Not as good, overall, as the softer Garmont G2."
  • Mark Elling: "It feels a little clunky with Vibram soles and the arch hump in bootboard that locks-up the foot."
  • Jim Schaffner: "Felt a little flat – did not have great snow feel, but the stance had a nice neutral feel. A good match for my frame."

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.2 See how we calculate

Head Mojo J.O. Pro

Tester Jim Schaffner said this about the Mojo J.O. Pro: "The biggest surprise for me so far in the test – there was nothing bad about this boot." And that pretty much sums up the testers’ collective feedback: virtually no flaws here. The closest thing to criticism that the J.O. Pro received was that it might be too powerful to the inside edge, meaning that its bootboard angles and cuff alignment produce a slightly "over-canted" set-up that really hooks-up the ski’s inside edge. Not a bad thing for those looking for edge power and easily remedied for others by way of a cuff adjustment.

The 115 flex put this boot on the softer side of the category. You might think that heavy-weights would find it verging on lacking support but very few testers complained. Most echoed comments about out-of-the-box comfort, precision edge control, all-mountain capability and an exceptionally sensitive feel for the snow. Testers also liked the translucent shell over the liner’s groovy lounge graphic motif. Several voiced a need to upgrade their outfits to keep pace with the J.O.’s tight styling.>

Tester Comments

  • Mike Porter: "You couldn’t ask for a better fit and it has a very good stance."
  • Neal Scholey: "Excellent no frills feel and seamless transitions between mung to moguls to groomers – a lot of folks will like it."
  • Mark Elling: "Flex feel is juicy and comfortable – automatic tranny."
  • Jim Schaffner: "I could feel every ripple in the snow."

Tester Comments

  • Mike Porter: "Very soft for a 115 flex."
  • Neal Scholey: "At speed, I got tossed in the back-seat once in a while."
  • Mark Elling: "Holy edge-bite Batman! Get ready to rock – the bootboard angle and cuff geometry makes for an edgy ride."

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.4 See how we calculate

Lange Super Banshee

Predictability and all-day comfort is the hallmark of the Super Banshee. Testers put this boot through its paces on every snow kind and terrain available. Invariably they registered comments that praised its neutral, natural stance (if a touch on the tall side) and its cushy creature-comfort liner construction. They really liked the potential to ski the boot all day on every part of the mountain and then leave them on for a few aprés rounds in the bar!

Testers with short lower leg shafts noticed that the boot cuff struck them higher than they would have liked, so long-legged skiers should like this set-up. More than one commented that the middle-of-the road stance geometry and all-day fit geared this boot toward the perfect-powder doctor/lawyer crowd. Our testers’ universal feeling of predictability in any snow condition make this an all-mountain choice for any skier – so long as they’re not looking for race-room performance specs.

Tester Comments

  • Doug McCaffrey: "Wear them for coffee in the morning, all the way to dancing at aprés-ski."
  • Joey Roberts: "Comfort! Narrow, low forefoot and soft, cushiony inner boot."
  • Mike Porter: "Does everything well – makes for a good all-mountain boot."
  • Jim Schaffner: "Predictability and consistency at all speeds, arcs and edge angles."

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.5 See how we calculate

Nordica Hot Rod 125

Testers who spent time skiing the Hot Rod’s past incarnations felt the boot’s best characteristics have been amplified and its weaknesses banished in the 09-10 version. Like a super-modified race car, the Hot Rod 125 design boasts an amalgam of features combined to suit its expert all-mountain target market. It uses a race-bred Dobermann chassis with detuned geometry and a softer flex. The shock-dampening FSE (Full Shock Eraser) bootboard and rear spoiler along with a stylish man-fur liner give the Hot Rod a mannered feel.

Testers who’d spent time skiing similar Nordicas slammed these on and started looking for deeper stashes and higher speeds. Neutrally aligned testers new to the Hot Rod’s outboard (a bit bow-leg) stance had to spend some time getting used to its aggressive drive to the inside edge. Testers agreed that the shock absorbing FSE bootboard (rubberized and hollow) performed as advertised. Some loved how it smoothed out the vibrations while ripping through variable snow conditions at high speed but others felt the boot was overly damp. A stiff bootboard option is available from Nordica to fine tune that feel.

The FSE rear spoiler produces a fairly forward stance. Some testers preferred removing the Velcro shim. Your ABB bootfitter could also grind it if you decide to seek a fore-aft middle ground. Our testers with shorter lower leg shafts liked the Hot Rod 125’s slightly lower cuff height.

Tester Comments

  • Mike Porter: "A detuned race boot for a targeted consumer – ideal for all-mountain skiing."
  • Jenn Metz: "I like the low shell and tongue height and love the fur liner – super comfy!"
  • Neal Scholey: "Fast reaction to pilot inputs, comfortable at all speeds – no complaints."
  • Mark Elling: "It handled it all and was snappy turn to turn. The best Hot Rod I’ve skied in years."
  • Jim Schaffner: "This boot is powerful and precise as well as relaxed and easy to slide the ski around in."

Tester Comments

  • Mike Porter: "The positive lateral cant felt awkward – I couldn’t skid the ski."
  • Jenn Metz: "I didn’t find it very quick edge-to-edge. It was best in softer snow."
  • Mark Elling: "Tongue Initially felt a bit abrupt at the boot top but it got better."
  • Jim Schaffner: "There’ll be a few hot spots for bony parts (styloid process!) against the shell that will need a punch or grind."

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.3 See how we calculate

Rossignol B-Squad Carbon 130

This newest version of the B-Squad garnered the most praise in its four-year test history. Our team agreed that the boot’s stance angles and flex characteristics were spot-on for high performance all-mountain skiing. Several testers mentioned that previous year’s fit inconsistencies had been smoothed away.

Testers found the B-Squad’s fore-aft and lateral stance to be ideal for either carving or skidding, bump skiing or crud crushing. The boot received high marks for its combination of comfort and performance. Some criticism was targeted at the boot’s generous fit in length, ankle pocket and instep height; a few testers said they’d downsize to ski the boot regularly.

But just as one man’s trash is another’s treasure, many testers raved about the B-Squad’s shell shape and liner construction. The boot has clean lines and a stripped down design that offers simple, functional adjustments and buckles, Vibram toe and heel plates and not much else to complain about – though some of our less fashion confident testers whined about having to wear white shoes.

Tester Comments

  • Doug McCaffrey: "Feels comfortable, without being sloppy or boxy – a great mix of performance and comfort."
  • Mike Porter: "Nice blend of quick, accurate, forgiving and playful. Great all around boot, very versatile."
  • Brian Blackstock: "Very forgiving expert boot."
  • Nick Blaylock: "Very strong cuff, well-built for taller or stronger skiers. Love the Vibram soles."
  • Chris Wiberg: "First boot in the test that carved as well as it schmeared!"
  • Mark Elling: "Skis like a weapon in all conditions."

Tester Comments

  • Joey Roberts: "I’d have to wear the smaller size!"
  • Brian Blackstock: "Cushy liners gave initial comfort but then encouraged over-buckling."
  • Nick Blaylock: "The high cuff makes for pressure on my calf and there’s some extra volume around my ankles and instep."
  • Chris Wiberg: "You will never find me wearing a white boot permanently."
  • Jim Schaffner: "Great all-mountain stance, but it felt slow and sluggish to me – very heavy."

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.4 See how we calculate

Salomon X3-RC

The X3-RC makes bold and at times contradictory, statements. It has a closure system that wraps the midfoot, ankle and lower leg like a second skin, but still leaves a large amount of room for the foot in length, the toebox and forefoot.

The boot is insanely powerful to the inside edge – the most so of the category – by virtue of its noticeably positive, or outboard, stance. Yet the X3-RC remained agile and versatile for most testers (though even our most bow-legged testers wondered if it was on the edge of too much edge). The closeness of the liner fit to the lower leg and ankle set the bar for fit tension in this category. The flex feel along the shin and the nature of the flex point perfectly situated at the ankle joint had shin bang sufferers signing up for special orders. A couple testers found themselves struggling with their fore-aft balance, perhaps as a result of the boot’s interesting bootboard ramp to forward lean angle configuration.

Wide footed rippers shouldn’t shy away due to the boot’s 98mm distinction. Salomon’s Custom Shell forefoot panels will accommodate wide, bony feet and expand to a purported 106mm! The X3-RC is another (very) white boot and apparently many of our Vail-based testers are sensitive to their boot coloration. The color was duly and derogatorily noted. Regardless of the breadth of statements made by the X3-RC, at the SEC Shack Test Center two things were certain: every tester wanted to try the boot and every tester had fun on it.

Tester Comments

  • Doug McCaffrey: "Quick like a cat, agile and light, great wrap on the upper cuff. "
  • Mike Porter: "Easy and accurate yet very powerful – given the roomy fit this boot rocked in power and stability."
  • Brian Blackstock: "Instant response. Snappy and quick. The wrap of the lower leg by the cuff is fantastic."
  • Mark Herseth: "I liked the edge power. It was different than what I'm used to, but it was fun."
  • Nick Blaylock: "Very strong and dominant on the downhill ski."
  • Neal Scholey: "Rally ready. Dominating. Superb. A hyper-charged performer with a great fit right out-of-the-box."
  • Chris Wiberg: "For the All-Mountain Racer Dude who enjoys carving groomers! "
  • Mark Elling: "Awesome flex feel. Like a sheet of cellophane separates you from your ski—think it, do it simultaneous."
  • Jim Schaffner: "Precision, power, control from skeleton to edge and from edge to skeleton."

Tester Comments

  • Mike Porter: "Feels too large for a 98mm category boot."
  • Brian Blackstock: "I felt like I was only skiing with my lower leg instead of with my feet."
  • Nick Blaylock: "Very bowlegged stance and the liner digs in heavily on my calf. "
  • Chris Wiberg: "May be a bit too positive laterally out-of-the-box for an all-mountain boot."
  • Mark Elling: "The way outboard stance is too much for me, but the dual cuff adjustment should do the trick."

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.4 See how we calculate

Tecnica Diablo Pro 130

Testers consistently put the Diablo Pro 130 toward the top of the heap within the 98mm category. Favorite aspects of the boot were its superior initial fit, stemming from both the shell shape and the liner construction (which many testers commented enthusiastically on). That led to near-flawless skiability in performance, all-mountain applications. Plug-and-play, wear-and-go, point-and-shoot phrasing was commonplace on tester cards. Only the burliest and most race-bred testers had any hint of a gripe about the boot’s power.

However, the boot does fit like a classic 98mm and a few testers found the fit aggressively snug at the lateral forefoot (6th toe), navicular bone and over the instep. A visit to your ABB bootfitter should be expected if you are properly sized in this boot. Testers also mentioned the boot’s aggressive, forward-leaning out-of-the-box stance and several removed the easy-out rear spoiler seeking a more upright position.

Tester Comments

  • Doug McCaffrey: "Real confident stance, easy to put on and go. A no brainer. "
  • Joey Roberts: "Security! Great boot to trust!"
  • Connor McKin: "No lag between flexing my boots and the skis' response."
  • Todd Metz: "Nice touch on bottom of foot."
  • Brian Blackstock: "Very easy to ski off-piste and in the bumps without compromising on-piste performance."
  • Chris Wiberg: "I always felt centered over the ski."
  • Mark Elling: "Awesome power strap and Velcro! Super grippy at instep and ankle—a prison-like closure system."
  • Jim Schaffner: "Fit is awesome. The new liner improves fit dramatically."

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.2 See how we calculate

Medium Width Boots(100mm)


Atomic Hawx 120

The Hawx 120 impressed our testers with its substantial flex. They drove this boot all over the mountain to explore its strengths and weaknesses. The strengths won out for the test team overall, with highest marks coming universally for the 120’s comfortable fit, from first try-on to the last run. Testers found the liner construction and shell shape to be particularly well suited to the wider-foot skier looking to maximize performance and step-up to the 100mm last category.

Testers were divided on whether they could actually feel the boot sole flexing – the Hawx’s unique raison d’être – and whether it indeed mattered at all. Some claimed the sole’s flex engendered a more freely arcing ski and loved the feel, a few thought it rendered the ski feel a little dull and the rest didn’t seem to notice. Several testers found the Hawx 120 a little dicey to get on their feet, but felt the great fit and closure sans hot spots counter-balanced the extra entry/exit effort.

Many testers felt that the slightly more upright than average cuff combined with a flatter than average bootboard produced a notably tall feeling stance. That’s good for some, not so good for others. Skiers looking to stand as tall as possible and eradicate that debilitating bottom of the run quad burn will like this.

Tester Comments

  • Doug McCaffrey: "Fit was good, nice liner, secure in the right places."
  • Greg Hoffmann: "Very neutral and comfortable."
  • Nick Blaylock: "Even feeling liner – smooth padding in the right places."
  • Dave Taylor: "Very upright shaft allows for good off-piste balance and progressive movements through the turn. . . a sweet slipper."
  • Chris Wiberg: "Cozy, comfortable."
  • Jack Rafferty: "Strong to edge with smooth flex."
  • Nick Kettinger: "You can truly feel the ski flex underfoot."
  • Jim Schaffner: "Good overall balance and great buckle tension without any points of pain—good energy transfer in short turns."

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 3.3 See how we calculate

Dalbello Surge 110

This latest freeride entry from the Proton series is a burly boot best suited for burly guys looking for power and predictability combined with plenty of comfort in an underrated 110 flex.

That word, Surge, has a pretty tough ring to it and many testers commented that it would be the ideal boot for someone with a muscular lower leg who also needed a boot that would support a good tall stance. Testers roundly described the boot as more substantial than its flex index would suggest. Our biggest, tallest testers liked the height and upright angle of the boot cuff as well as the additional room the cuff offered in circumference. That’s a great combination for skiers looking for enough upper cuff to handle off-piste bump and jump but without having to go race-boot stiff. All-day comfort marks were high for the Surge, as were its scores for lateral power.

Tester Comments

  • Doug McCaffrey: "Nice lateral movement, comfortable at speed. The tall cuffs supported the lower leg."
  • Greg Hoffmann: "Really the best fitting, best skiing boot in the category."
  • David Taylor: "Great boot for the 100-102mm category foot with a larger calf."
  • Chris Wiberg: "Stiff spine holds well at dude speeds! Laterally solid and angles are perfect."
  • Jack Rafferty: "Comfy toes and a strong, upright stance."
  • Jim Schaffner: "Good edge power and stability at speed for a 110 flex – excellent comfort to performance ratio."

Tester Comments

  • Nick Blaylock: "Too upright. Couldn’t get forward."
  • Greg Hoffmann: "The throat of the shell is a little rugged, making the boot a bit difficult to get on."
  • Jack Rafferty: "Strong and stable but not terribly sensitive."
  • Jim Schaffner: "Low on the energy transmission scale."

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 3.3 See how we calculate

Daleboot VFF Pro

How does an entire test team review a fully custom boot, like this one from DaleBoot? Just like any other boot at the test but with an understanding that the lower shell was built around one skier’s foot specs (test director Mark Elling’s) and the Intuition custom liner was likewise molded to that foot. Since fit scores would obviously be skewed we didn’t included them. But we felt performance and general stance impressions were valid and merited review.

First, a couple procedural notes, the boot was built to Elling’s fit specifications after a personal fitting/measurement session performed by DaleBoot staff at the SIA trade show in January 09. The boot was first tested at Mt. Bachelor in early spring ’09 and the best marks of that test centered on the close fit to Elling’s foot shape and lack of any needed shell or liner work to achieve all-day comfort. The guy for whom the boot was built thought the fit was spot on.

That said, Elling’s initial on-snow tests yielded very similar performance results as those performed by the test team at Vail. Most commonly, testers found the stance very upright and the forward flex very soft – even on the stiffest flex setting. This is not necessarily bad or good, but rather depends much on the tester’s skiing style. The liner tongue rides particularly high on the leg, yet the shell strikes the lower leg a touch below most others. This translated into slightly less edge power than the test average for the category and a long flex range with a cushy feel along the shin and at the calf. Stance angle modifications can be made both in the three-quarter length bootboard and via modular canted sole plates—though neither adjustment was part of this test’s protocols. Perhaps with more time spent tweaking the ride for personal preference the stance issues associated with this boot could be mitigated. Though the DaleBoot VFF Pro didn’t power its way to any category dominance, it did impress a few testers with its level of comfort and skiability.

Tester Comments

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.7 See how we calculate

brand model

Tester Comments

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.7 See how we calculate

brand model

Tester Comments

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.7 See how we calculate

brand model

Tester Comments

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.7 See how we calculate

brand model

Tester Comments

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.7 See how we calculate

brand model

Tester Comments

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.7 See how we calculate

brand model

Tester Comments

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.7 See how we calculate

brand model

Tester Comments

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.7 See how we calculate

Wide Boots(102+ mm)


model

Tester Comments

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.7 See how we calculate

brand model

Tester Comments

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.7 See how we calculate

brand model

Tester Comments

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.7 See how we calculate

brand model

Tester Comments

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.7 See how we calculate

brand model

Tester Comments

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.7 See how we calculate

brand model

Tester Comments

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.7 See how we calculate

brand model

Tester Comments

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.7 See how we calculate

brand model

Tester Comments

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.7 See how we calculate

brand model

Tester Comments

Tester Comments

Fit Tension Rating (1=tighest and 5=loosest) = 2.7 See how we calculate

  • Mt Bachelor Ski Resort
    Official ABB Boot Test Site
  • Mount Bachelor Village Resort
    Official ABB Boot Test Accommodations
  • Bolle Optics
    Official Boot Test Team Eyewear